It’s neat how just a few simple things, if done sufficiently, make for absorbing cinema: 1) well-drawn characters with understandable motivations, 2) an eye for style, with particular attention to the art—the music, really—of editing, and 3) a point of view, or points of view, of the world that any mature individual can recognize as having come from a lived perspective, i.e. the filmmakers respect the fact that their audiences are sufficiently experienced with both art and life to not be demeaned to with puerile sloganeering.
I did not mention any specific kind of style—lavish or minimalist, snappy or static, etc.—nor did I claim that the characters have to be all that original or of extraordinary depth; and it is not necessary for the filmmaker’s POV to introduce some groundbreaking worldview(s) capable of massive societal shift. Cinema, after all, is just as much a craft as it is a result of subjective expression, and the elements identified above are tried-and-true methods, across a variety of genres, of involving a viewer in one’s chosen narrative.
Bart Layton’s Crime 101, in spite of its blasé title, is just that sort of cinema. It is also a solid example of “formula” done right. While most feature films follow at least some type of convention, narrative predictability, though it creates a certain ceiling, is also just as much an invitation to innovate as it is to stultify. Crime 101 slants more toward the former than the latter, papering over its inevitable series of plot-propelling implausibilities, and frillier adherences to genre cliche, with a lean-and-clean, almost throwback, approach that satisfies the engaged viewer with sheer pleasure of technique, as well as empathetic performances by a cast of seasoned industry veterans. […]